<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PleaseRobMe Highlights the Obvious in Terrifying Fashion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.locationmeme.com/2010/02/17/pleaserobme-highlights-the-obvious-in-terrifying-fashion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.locationmeme.com/2010/02/17/pleaserobme-highlights-the-obvious-in-terrifying-fashion/</link>
	<description>news &#38; analysis of the social location graph</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 11:58:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: perryevans</title>
		<link>http://www.locationmeme.com/2010/02/17/pleaserobme-highlights-the-obvious-in-terrifying-fashion/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>perryevans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locationmeme.com/?p=418#comment-331</guid>
		<description>I remember going through this kind of media storm in the early launch days @ MapQuest.  MapQuest &amp; Switchboard were profiled on the &quot;Stalker HomePage&quot; and the story went from there straight into the mainstream press.  We used the same arguments (you can find the same info out through other techniques, we&#039;re just adding convenience), and it worked.  However, I&#039;d argue that (in that era) MapQuest/Switchboard were such clearly useful tools for everyday use that the consumer didn&#039;t want to &quot;go backwards&quot;.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To me, the risk and challenge is for these new gen services to prove enough application value/engagement to have this same natural consumer effect.  IMHO, the apps have yet to find that &quot;aha&quot; moment in consumer&#039;s minds, so the risk to these services is indeed very real.  Services with a mediocre value propositions could be seriously damaged by a media storm if it whips up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember going through this kind of media storm in the early launch days @ MapQuest.  MapQuest &#038; Switchboard were profiled on the &#8220;Stalker HomePage&#8221; and the story went from there straight into the mainstream press.  We used the same arguments (you can find the same info out through other techniques, we&#39;re just adding convenience), and it worked.  However, I&#39;d argue that (in that era) MapQuest/Switchboard were such clearly useful tools for everyday use that the consumer didn&#39;t want to &#8220;go backwards&#8221;.  </p>
<p>To me, the risk and challenge is for these new gen services to prove enough application value/engagement to have this same natural consumer effect.  IMHO, the apps have yet to find that &#8220;aha&#8221; moment in consumer&#39;s minds, so the risk to these services is indeed very real.  Services with a mediocre value propositions could be seriously damaged by a media storm if it whips up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
